A large part of me is saying “oh. Florals for Spring. How original.” But then I’m realizing that’s just Miranda Priestly’s voice flying out of my mouth. So – floral tights, yay, yea or nay?
![]() | Are Your Tights Sexy Or Sensible? |
![]() | 10 Fantastic Pairs Of Tights For You |
![]() | Wait, You Guys Wear Underwear Under Your Tights? |










Previous Post




In theory they’re cute, I bought a pair at primark and the flowers stretch out and look bad around my thighs. Well, apparently florals are only for girls with stick straight legs.
if you are in elementary school or even middle school, sure. i dont see it being acceptable if you do not fit into those two categories. unless you are a hipster, then i guess it would be cool.
i love them. but i wear them with a neutrals. :D
Nay! That’s a one-way ticket to leprosy legs. I’m sorry. I mean Hansen’s disease.
God seriously, shades of 1994 all over again. I wore it then, I’ll give it a miss now and leave it to the younger morons.
Ya know, I always think at first they are cute–, but when I actually see them on someones legs I have to do a double take to make sure they don’t have a bunch of bruising and lesions – and are in fact wearing floral tights…
I don’t mind floral tights, but certainly not with a floral dress, as picture. Double trouble.
Not unless I get to be 17 years old again and wear them with a frilly dress and green docs.